Will You Help Us Save WiFi?

8 replies [Last post]
jxself
Offline
Joined: 09/13/2010

The libreCMC project wants to know if you will help them Save WiFi. Will you???

See https://librecmc.org/librecmc/wiki?name=Save_WiFi for more information.

bluzeo
Offline
Joined: 08/27/2015

this the third time i have tried using that site.......

Chris

I am a member!

Offline
Joined: 04/23/2011

Go to www.savewifi.org - it's cached. I think Slashdot linked to the libreplanet.org server! Errg which is causing problems again. Josh @ the FSF is going to get someone to setup something on FSF.org (which can handle the loads apparently) or another server... shortly... I hope.

willieaames
Offline
Joined: 10/15/2014

You make a strong argument - I'm in.

tomlukeywood
Offline
Joined: 12/05/2014

Also everyone make sure to tell everyone you know to submit a formal complaint

Chris

I am a member!

Offline
Joined: 04/23/2011

The FCC servers are down now- but they will be accepting comments again on September 9th. So please if you haven't commented make yourself a little note- * September 9th go to www.savewifi.org * and we'll have an updated link to the NEW FCC SITE COMMENT SITE.

t3g
t3g
Offline
Joined: 05/15/2011

I have a feeling that the FCC is going to do what they want anyways due to pressure from major corporations that make these network devices and don't want free software evangelists removing their firmware and throwing on an open one.

tomlukeywood
Offline
Joined: 12/05/2014

well giving up dose not help
so we have to try anyway

Chris

I am a member!

Offline
Joined: 04/23/2011

The FCC might do what it wants to do regardless of our actions, but it won't be because corporations are dictating this. The corporations generally *don't* want more regulation unless it benefits them. I'm having a hard to pointing fingers at anybody or industry. What corporation(s) would feel free software is a threat? Maybe Microsoft or Intel, but its far from being the likely culprit at this point. The best I could come up with is Intel has some new hardware tech that they can license out to others. However the rules passed and being proposed don't require this hardware tech or any hardware component. That would be a future rule not yet proposed. Adding signature checking to the firmware would be adequate to solve the current problem- so long as it prevents the replacement of the firmware (thinking routers, unsure how you could even begin to do this with a desktop/laptop, but none-the-less, you could certainly do it in some fashion).

I think we have to assume this is for the moment an over-reaction to airports complaints on interferences with doppler radar systems. The issue is that of a few abusers and this would be a quick fix. They've completely overlooked at the moment the huge collateral damage that would occur. However it's going to be an uphill battle to fix this as some of the rules have already passed and coming into effect now. The current action against the proposed rules is our (the community, savewifi.org, etc) step one of a multiple step road map to fix the problem.