Gitorious is dead - acquired by GitLab

18 respuestas [Último envío]
doolio
Desconectado/a
se unió: 12/31/2013
lloydsmart

I am a member!

Desconectado/a
se unió: 12/22/2012

Meh, it will still be free software. I don't see what all the fuss is about.

jxself
Desconectado/a
se unió: 09/13/2010

"Meh, it will still be free software"

No it won't. GitLab.com runs the proprietary Enterprise Edition. I wrote on the things I looked at: http://jxself.org/goodbye-gitorious.shtml

Legimet
Desconectado/a
se unió: 12/10/2013

I hadn't heard of it before reading your post, but Gogs looks great.

t3g
t3g
Desconectado/a
se unió: 05/15/2011

Hey, at least you can still get the community edition for free (as in freedom and beer) and run it without hassle.

The reason these companies do an "enterprise edition" is to give reassurance to big companies who want support contracts and have code tailored to them. Its a win-win as this funds the core software so the project can stay alive and appeal to both the FLOSS and enterprise audiences.

jxself
Desconectado/a
se unió: 09/13/2010

"Hey, at least you can still get the community edition for free (as in freedom and beer) and run it without hassle."

And prop up GitLab B.V.'s proprietary software business in the process. Their idea is very clear: Maybe you'll become a paying customer for the proprietary version later on. Since they only get money when people do, that is clearly what they're betting on. At the very least even if you don't it's free advertising so maybe someone else will even if not you.

"The reason these companies do an "enterprise edition" is to give reassurance to big companies who want support contracts and have code tailored to them. Its a win-win as this funds the core software so the project can stay alive and appeal to both the FLOSS and enterprise audiences."

I have no objection to that in principal - Companies can make all the support contracts they want and have people pay them as much money as they can get, as long as what people get in the end is free software. It used to be but it later became proprietary. I wish it still were free.

doolio
Desconectado/a
se unió: 12/31/2013

I'm not so sure it will remain free. It may have to be forked for that to be the case. My understanding is that GitLab will gradually move Gitorious users over to their platform. They may then encourage/persuade people to move to their enterprise edition which I believe is proprietary. Please correct me if I'm wrong.

ericfontaine
Desconectado/a
se unió: 03/05/2015

"My understanding is that GitLab will gradually move Gitorious users over to their platform."

Incorrect. The GitLab CEO has stated in HN (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9139511) that "[Existing Gitorious users] will have to import their repo's into GitLab." and clarified that "We don't want to move people's code without them agreeing with that move to another organization." I think this is partly because of the concern that some gitorious users may not want their code hosted on gitlab.com's proprietary enterprise edition. The gitlab ceo even pointed out links to other fully opensource hosting services.

t3g
t3g
Desconectado/a
se unió: 05/15/2011

If you are worried about GitLab going enterprise only down the road, nothing is stopping you from forking the code right now and keeping the MIT license or making it GPL.

doolio
Desconectado/a
se unió: 12/31/2013

I'm not a developer. I'm slowly trying to learn some skills in my free time so perhaps I can contribute to a project even in a small way in the future. I am however a strong supporter of the FaiF movement. And therefore, feel this move does not help our (?) cause.

"While originally itself open source software, SourceForge was commercialized as v2.5 prototype code and eventually relicensed under a proprietary software license as SourceForge Enterprise Edition. The original codebase was forked by the GNU Project as Savane. It was also later forked as GForge by one of the SourceForge programmers, and then GForge was itself forked as FusionForge by three GForge developers." - (source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SourceForge_Enterprise_Edition)

... but you are right there are alternatives to Gitorious out there - jxself provided a quick synopsis above.

Legimet
Desconectado/a
se unió: 12/10/2013

SourceForge later moved to Apache Allura, which is free software.

doolio
Desconectado/a
se unió: 12/31/2013

Thanks for the correction. That's good news.

onpon4
Desconectado/a
se unió: 05/30/2012

I'm not a fan of SourceForge. I recently decided to pick up a game called Project: Starfighter, give it some updates, and start maintaining it. But I found myself unable to get any sort of link to the Git repository without running SourceForge's JavaScript code. In the end, I ran the JavaScript so I could get the Git link, but it's ridiculous that this is required.

Out of everything I've tried at this point, and that includes Gitorious, my favorite host for libre software is Savannah. Granted, I haven't tried many of the others jxself listed in his post.

alimiracle
Desconectado/a
se unió: 01/18/2014

hay
I wonte make fork from GitLab to making it GPL. v3

megurineturilli
Desconectado/a
se unió: 01/10/2012

The software running on the server is nonfree, but there is still the possibility to host your own server using free software. First I cloned all my repositories to my own laptop using a python script that automates the cloning of many repositories. In the long term a decentralized git hosting is needed, some kind of gittorrent sync. Maybe using gnunet and psyc.

AdjuntoTamaño
cloneall.py_.txt 371 bytes
alimiracle
Desconectado/a
se unió: 01/18/2014

hay
you test
git-php??
http://code.google.com/p/git-php/

it under gpl v2

Calinou
Desconectado/a
se unió: 03/08/2014

The wiki pages say: “Updated Feb 4, 2010…”

Legimet
Desconectado/a
se unió: 12/10/2013

And the last commit was on Sep 30, 2007.