GNU/Linux distros ethics comparison meme

In a way it is, it has already become mainstream for people to not take so-called Ubuntu too seriously and to know that it's not a respectful distro, with malicious things like Snaps and the like, meanwhile Mint is actually taken seriously and people who dislike so-called Ubuntu often recommend Mint, so in a way Mint is worse and more dangerous than so-called Ubuntu due to Mint's higher reputation. Mint pretends to be some sort of "better Ubuntu" by disabling things like Snaps, but in practice Mint is quite similar to so-called Ubuntu due to how both promote proprietary software, so the main difference between Mint and so-called Ubuntu is that one (Mint) is seem as a friend while the other (so-called Ubuntu) is seem as an enemy, so Mint is in practice more dangerous

It is a similar situation with Debian, Debian has become increasingly more proprietary with things like automatic installation of freedom-denying firmware, yet people still take Debian too seriously, meaning Debian might be a greater threat to user freedom than so-called Ubuntu. So-called Ubuntu has become some sort of laughing stock in some communities, yet Debian and Mint are still taken too seriously. https://jxself.org/debian-doubletalk.shtml

I'm calling it "so-called Ubuntu" because the word ubuntu is an ancient African word meaning "humanity to others" (symbolized by "I am because we are"), and therefore I do not see so-called Ubuntu's use of the term ubuntu as legitimate because so-called Ubuntu is clearly lacking in the "humanity" aspect.