Re: I messed up trying to install Brave, Browser, and now can't get any system updates

2 respuestas [Último envío]
Zelphir Kaltstahl
Desconectado/a
se unió: 11/11/2019

On 1/12/20 8:59 PM, name at domain wrote:
> Message: 1
> Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2020 15:14:51 +0100 (CET)
> From: name at domain
> To: name at domain
> Subject: Re: [Trisquel-users] I messed up trying to install Brave
> Browser, and now can't get any system updates
> Message-ID:
> <name at domain>
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes
>
> Sorry for hijacking this thread but wouldn't Ungoogled Chromium be a great
> addition for future Trisquel releases? I think most of the people that
> install Brave on Linux distros do so because they need a chromium-based
> browser. (for certain addons most likely?) Ungoogled Chromium would be their
> best option.
>
> https://guix.gnu.org/packages/ungoogled-chromium-78.0.3904.108-0.8f06513/
>
> https://github.com/Eloston/ungoogled-chromium

Hi,

No, it would not be anyone's best option.

* It's not free software.
* It adds to web engine monoculture.

Why do people "need" a Chromium based browser? I've not heard of any
case, where that was not only an illusion of the person thinking, that
they need it.

Regards,
Zelphir

chaosmonk

I am a member!

I am a translator!

Desconectado/a
se unió: 07/07/2017

> * It's not free software.

Can you please link to some proof of this (such a file with a non-free
or missing license)? I have heard the claim that Chromium has files
with unclear licensing, but when I looked into it I was unable to find a
current example of such a file.

> Why do people "need" a Chromium based browser? I've not heard of any
> case, where that was not only an illusion of the person thinking, that
> they need it.

I agree.

Beko
Desconectado/a
se unió: 08/31/2019

>* It adds to web engine monoculture.

Doesn't Firefox and it's derivatives contribute to that the most in GNU/Linux distributions? Not defending anything Google btw, fuckem.