Virtualbox-ose isn't cutting it (likely due to unrecognized hardware). I want to try VMware player.

6 respuestas [Último envío]
Drewski
Desconectado/a
se unió: 07/18/2013

I suspect that these trisquel (3.2.0-48) and linux-libre (3.10) kernels don't like some of my hardware. Particularly my graphics hardware... Its AMD "Vision" (CPU is AMD Athlon II 2.1GHZ). Some low-end integrated chip that was probably not produced in significant volume.

For instance:

1. In the details menu under system settings my graphics driver is unknown and "fallback".

2. I am stuck with GNOME classic. I originally got some kind of message saying the full GNOME environment could not be loaded.

3. VM performance in virtualbox is quite slow no matter which OS I use or which VM RAM config I use. I have 4GB of system ram so I normally allocate about 1.5-2.5GB to the VM.

4. I normally leave the graphics settings of the VM on default, but even increasing the graphics memory hasn't yielded any noticeable improvements.

5. The available desktop resolutions inside of all of the VMs are not ones which match the aspect ratio of my monitor so I end up with black bars inside of all of my VMs (black areas on the left and right to compensate for the resolution/ratio mismatch)

My intention is to use VMs as my container for all non-free software that I sometimes need to run. I debated triple booting (Win 7, Trisquel, and Debian) and using debian for most of my non-free software (Win 7 as last resort) but it doesn't seem worth it to me when I could just use VMs inside of Trisquel when needed. VMs are more flexible anyhow since they can relatively easily be ported over to another PC/device down the road if need be.

Unless there is some reasonably painless solution to my Virtualbox-ose issues I'd like to give VMware player a try. However, these (aforementioned) kernels appear to have discluded whatever modules/firmware/etc. are needed for VMware player so I'm still stuck with virtualbox-ose at the moment.

dadix
Desconectado/a
se unió: 07/01/2013

I can't run VB on kernel 3.10 also (and I have Intel processor), but for kernel 3.2 you must to install headers generic:

sudo apt-get install linux-headers-`uname -r`

Cyberhawk

I am a translator!

Desconectado/a
se unió: 07/27/2010

If you have performance and resolution issues, it means you need to install the VBox Guest Additions. It enables more resolutions, usage of opengl and shared folders. VMPlayer is not in the repos and might have extra dependencies that are cumbersome to install (or even non-free if you are unlucky). The preffered way is to use VBox.

If, for whatever reason, you really need to use VMPlayer over VirtualBox, be careful not to install any non-free software.

I've taken a look at the licenses of VMPlayer, it is kind of messy. There are lots of different licenses, for lots of different parts of the program. Most of the time it's GNU GPL, LGPL, MPL or Apache. So far it looks OK to use.

However there are the Q Public License, V1.0 and a Common Development and Distribution License, V1.0. I am not sure if those are free software, take a look at www.gnu.org, they have a list of licenses that are considered free software, even if they are no copyleft licenses. If both these licenses are free, there is no reason to not try VMPlayer out.

miga
Desconectado/a
se unió: 09/17/2011

VMware Player is non-free software. See below.

https://www.vmware.com/download/eula/player40.html

maccaches
Desconectado/a
se unió: 06/08/2013

As mentioned above, VMWare Player is completely non-free, and I cannot find the source code. If you are referring to VMWare Player, then where are the licenses you speak of?

Drewski
Desconectado/a
se unió: 07/18/2013

I'll avoid VMplayer if I can get around it (due to non-free issues), but my instinct is that it will have the best performance of all the no-cost VM software available.

Is there any difference between virtualbox-ose (as in apt-get install virtualbox-ose) and virtualbox (as in apt-get install virtualbox)? Isn't virtualbox just open source period (excluding the guest additions)?

I have Qemulator and Qemu Launcher are these similar to aqemu? Whats the main difference between these and virtualbox?

andrew
Desconectado/a
se unió: 04/19/2012

On 28/07/13 03:31, aftermath5 wrote:
> Is there any difference between virtualbox-ose (as in apt-get install
> virtualbox-ose) and virtualbox (as in apt-get install virtualbox)?
> Isn't virtualbox just open source period (excluding the guest
> additions)?

virtualbox-ose is a virtual package for virtualbox. Yes, I believe
VirtualBox is now entirely free software, although I haven't done any
real checking of this (besides reading on the VB website).

You can read the FAQ on their website:
https://www.virtualbox.org/wiki/Licensing_FAQ

Apparently the VirtualBox extension pack is proprietary software.

Andrew.