What WiFi speeds can I expect?

21 respuestas [Último envío]
kabo
Desconectado/a
se unió: 09/05/2015

I bought this Atheros AR5B95 AR9285 from amazon:
http://www.amazon.com/Atheros-AR5B95-AR9285-802-11A-PCI-E/dp/B0098VWMOE/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1441819790&sr=8-1&keywords=B0098VWMOE

But I'm not very satisfied with the wifi speed, I think it's quite slow. iwconfig says Bit Rate is 65 Mb/s, Tx-Power 31 dBm, Link Quality 70/70, Signal level -39 dBm.
I'm getting around 1 megabyte/s transfers.

But isn't that card supposed to be 802.11n? My MacBook with 802.11n has a Bit Rate of 217 Mb/s and downloads at around 11 megabytes/second.

Is there some config I should tweak to get faster wifi?

kabo
Desconectado/a
se unió: 09/05/2015

Seems it can get better, but I've already done the stuff in this post with no difference:
https://askubuntu.com/a/186603

antiesnob
Desconectado/a
se unió: 08/22/2013

65/8=8MB/s Don't know why u get 1MB/s

How's your network desing? You have 1MB/s transfer from the Internet or from a local computer of your LAN/PAN? How far is the router from the atheros? More than one computer is downloading data from Internet? Information needed!

kabo
Desconectado/a
se unió: 09/05/2015

I was downloading the same file from my NAS on both computers. Both computers approx 3 meters from the router. The file was traveling from my NAS, cat6 cable, Asus RT-AC68U, WiFi, to laptop, in both cases. Transfer was over SMB.

I'm at work now, but when I get home I do a better test for the actual speeds. My thinking is that I can set up my home server like this:
$ cat /dev/urandom | nc -l 1234
and then on my laptop
$ nc server.ip 1234 > /dev/null

That should be a better indicator for actual max speeds. I'll try to get that done tonight.

Is anybody else using an X200 with Atheros AR9285? What kind of speeds are you getting?

moxalt
Desconectado/a
se unió: 06/19/2015

> 11 megabytes/second

You lucky people- I consider 300kb/s fast. 500 tops. Usually around 120.

Calinou
Desconectado/a
se unió: 03/08/2014

I think they are talking about local copying speeds. With Gigabit Ethernet, you can reach up to ~120 MB/s (megabytes, not megabits). With Fast Ethernet, ~12 MB/s.

davidnotcoulthard (no verificado)
davidnotcoulthard

Metoo - I consider 40kb/s as decent (I usually get around 120 too though)!

kabo
Desconectado/a
se unió: 09/05/2015

OK, I did the test with urandom described above. My MacBook is stable at 16 megabyte/s. My X200 is fluctuating wildly but seems to average around 500 kilobyte/s.

The Bit Rate from iwconfig says 65 Mb/s but the card is capable of 150 Mb/s (to my understanding). Nobody else here running a libreboot X200 with an atheros card? Does the transfer speeds not get any better that this?

Chris

I am a member!

Desconectado/a
se unió: 04/23/2011

You won't be able to get 150 Mb/s. That's more a theoretical maximum.

antiesnob
Desconectado/a
se unió: 08/22/2013

What happens if u switch the pcs places? atheros to the mac and vice versa?
Don0t have a x200, sorry

kabo
Desconectado/a
se unió: 09/05/2015

The machines are sitting next to each other. Or do you mean switch the network cards of the computers? I don't think that's going to work...

antiesnob
Desconectado/a
se unió: 08/22/2013

The first

kabo
Desconectado/a
se unió: 09/05/2015

I've bought a AR9280, a AR9281 and a AR9287 to see if they are any better. Will be back with results when I get them in the mail :)

antiesnob
Desconectado/a
se unió: 08/22/2013

See u r plenty of money to give. Any litecoins 4 the poor?? LOL

kabo
Desconectado/a
se unió: 09/05/2015

It's $25 for three cards, shipping included. That kind of money I can afford to spend :)

antiesnob
Desconectado/a
se unió: 08/22/2013

Have u read the first review in da amazon link?

What happens if u move the NB to 7 meters from the router? Without the mac?

Try check the router settings: set to only /n instead of backwards compatibility and reboot it.

Also why don't you put the output:

lshw -C network

kabo
Desconectado/a
se unió: 09/05/2015

My router is already set to only n. It doesn't make any difference if the Mac is present or not or if I move the thinkpad around.

output:

$ sudo lshw -C network
*-network
description: Ethernet interface
product: 82567LM Gigabit Network Connection
vendor: Intel Corporation
physical id: 19
bus info: pci@0000:00:19.0
logical name: eth0
version: 03
serial: 00:1f:16:11:72:ba
capacity: 1Gbit/s
width: 32 bits
clock: 33MHz
capabilities: pm msi bus_master cap_list ethernet physical tp 10bt 10bt-fd 100bt 100bt-fd 1000bt-fd autonegotiation
configuration: autonegotiation=on broadcast=yes driver=e1000e driverversion=2.3.2-k firmware=1.8-3 latency=0 link=no multicast=yes port=twisted pair
resources: irq:44 memory:e1700000-e171ffff memory:e1724000-e1724fff ioport:4000(size=32)
*-network
description: Wireless interface
product: AR9285 Wireless Network Adapter (PCI-Express)
vendor: Qualcomm Atheros
physical id: 0
bus info: pci@0000:02:00.0
logical name: wlan0
version: 01
serial: 74:f0:6d:0d:6f:bb
width: 64 bits
clock: 33MHz
capabilities: pm msi pciexpress bus_master cap_list ethernet physical wireless
configuration: broadcast=yes driver=ath9k driverversion=3.13.0-63-generic firmware=N/A ip=172.27.27.172 latency=0 link=yes multicast=yes wireless=IEEE 802.11bgn
resources: irq:17 memory:e1500000-e150ffff

Chris

I am a member!

Desconectado/a
se unió: 04/23/2011

What you need to do is go get a dual-band card. Your speeds you can get should improve.

kabo
Desconectado/a
se unió: 09/05/2015

Yup, that's what I'm hoping for. Hopefully I'll be able to give a good review on which of the four cards I'll have in total works best for me.

kabo
Desconectado/a
se unió: 09/05/2015

OK, the results are in!

Here's how I tested:
On my local server (connected with gigabit tp to my Asus RT-AC68U) I ran
$ cat /dev/urandom | nc -l 1234
and on my X200 I ran
$ nc server.ip 1234 > /dev/null
I then monitored the speeds with conky and estimated the average speed I was getting.

Here's what I got
ar5b91 5.5-6 mb/s
ar5b92 12.5-13 mb/s
ar5b97 11.5-12 mb/s

So now I'm using the ar5b92 card and it seems to be performing nicely :)

EDIT: clarification
ar5b91 => ar9281
ar5b92 => ar9280 (actually ar5bhb92?)
ar5b97 => ar9287

antiesnob
Desconectado/a
se unió: 08/22/2013

Thanks 4 the feedback :D