why isn't "vrms" available in the repos?

3 respuestas [Último envío]
SalmanMohammadi
Desconectado/a
se unió: 02/23/2012

Why isn't vrms, which is a GNU GPL software, available in the repo's of Trisquel 6?

[0]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vrms
[1]: http://packages.ubuntu.com/precise/vrms

lembas
Desconectado/a
se unió: 05/13/2010
onpon4
Desconectado/a
se unió: 05/30/2012

Its name is also a bit misleading. It's based on the Debian Free Software Guidelines, which differ slightly from Richard Stallman's view (most notably, Debian considers the GNU FDL to be nonfree).

quiliro@congresolibre.org
Desconectado/a
se unió: 10/28/2010

El 12/06/13 08:53, name at domain escribió:
> Its name is also a bit misleading. It's based on the Debian Free
> Software Guidelines, which differ slightly from Richard Stallman's
> view (most notably, Debian considers the GNU FDL to be nonfree).

Then it should be named VD. But Debian should not need it unless it has
nonfree repos!

--
Saludos libres,

Quiliro Ordóñez
Presidente (en conjunto con el resto de socios)
Asociación de Software Libre del Ecuador - ASLE
Av de la Prensa N58-219 y Cristóbal Vaca de Castro
Quito, Ecuador
(02)-600 8579
IRC: http://webchat.freenode.net?channels=asle&uio=OT10cnVlJjEwPXRydWU3a

Todo correo que reciba será tratado como información pública, de libre copia y modificación, sin importar cualquier nota de confidencialidad.