Copyleft For the Next Decade: A Comprehensive Plan

5 réponses [Dernière contribution]
jxself
Hors ligne
A rejoint: 09/13/2010

http://files.jxself.org/Copyleft_For_The_Next_Decade-A_Comprehensive_Plan.webm

By Bradley Kuhn given on Friday January 5 2016 at [GNU/]LinuxConf Australia: https://linux.conf.au/schedule/30203/view_talk?day=friday

Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Like 4.0 International License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

jxself
Hors ligne
A rejoint: 09/13/2010

http://files.jxself.org/Copyleft_For_The_Next_Decade-A_Comprehensive_Plan.webm

By Bradley Kuhn given on Friday January 5 2016 at [GNU/]LinuxConf Australia:
https://linux.conf.au/schedule/30203/view_talk?day=friday

Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Like 4.0 International
License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

t3g
t3g
Hors ligne
A rejoint: 05/15/2011

I may be releasing something in the next few months and it will be using the copyleft Mozilla Public License (MPL) version 2.0 license. No way would I want to go permissive with all the work I put into it so far.

jxself
Hors ligne
A rejoint: 09/13/2010

Why not go with stronger copyleft like the GPL, or even better AGPL?

moxalt
Hors ligne
A rejoint: 06/19/2015

Why MPL specifically?

Allanitomwesh
Hors ligne
A rejoint: 10/24/2015

Why Mozilla's licence instead of GPL? (orAGPL,LGPL)