Copyleft For the Next Decade: A Comprehensive Plan
- Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires
http://files.jxself.org/Copyleft_For_The_Next_Decade-A_Comprehensive_Plan.webm
By Bradley Kuhn given on Friday January 5 2016 at [GNU/]LinuxConf Australia: https://linux.conf.au/schedule/30203/view_talk?day=friday
Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Like 4.0 International License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
http://files.jxself.org/Copyleft_For_The_Next_Decade-A_Comprehensive_Plan.webm
By Bradley Kuhn given on Friday January 5 2016 at [GNU/]LinuxConf Australia:
https://linux.conf.au/schedule/30203/view_talk?day=friday
Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Like 4.0 International
License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
I may be releasing something in the next few months and it will be using the copyleft Mozilla Public License (MPL) version 2.0 license. No way would I want to go permissive with all the work I put into it so far.
Why not go with stronger copyleft like the GPL, or even better AGPL?
Why MPL specifically?
Why Mozilla's licence instead of GPL? (orAGPL,LGPL)
- Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires