Is this Libre software?
- Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires
I don't find this software, truecrypt, in the FSF directory, but from reading the license, it seems to be free - the full detailed source code is available, you can modify it, distribute it, etc.: http://www.truecrypt.org/legal/license
Because it is not available for installation through Synaptic and Add/Remove Applications, I downloaded the tar file, extracted it, and now I have a shell script file. What is the easiest way for me to now install it?
Wow, I installed it! I can't believe I managed to do it so easily! In case another novice is interested, I right-clicked on the folder where the shell script file was (the extracted file), chose Open in Terminal, then in the terminal typed:
./truecrypt-7.1a-setup-x86*
i.e., added ./ before the name of the file and * at the end of it. Then just followed the instructions (accept licence, etc.)
Then found the name of the package in the directory /usr/share/applications and opened it by double-clicking on it. That started the application.
So I guess to install package that is not available through Synaptic, you just do ./FILENAME* where FILENAME is the name of the shell file, but corerct me if I am wrong.
Search the forum for old discussions, it has very complex wording and
unique clauses that make many people consider it nonfree, while I
disagree with all their specific arguments.
I haven't seen such self-extracting tar archive shell scripts used for
other software (it contains a tar file after the script part).
Interesting solution, not as nice as distro packages which need
e.g. simpler licensing.
Thanks icarolongo. Darn... That's unfortunate, since I found it easier to use than any other package in Trisqual that does the same.
Fortunately I saved the uninstall instructions: sudo truecrypt-uninstall.sh which removed it.
Have you tried Tomb?
It is similar to truecrypt and it is free software. It is a script nowadays (used to be a package) so it is used with CLI.
"But it also contains sections such as"
I think that it the reply is, perhaps, intended to be a non-exhaustive list of reasons the FSF doesn't consider it to be free.
- Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires