Is linux-libre compatibility better compared to hurd?

9 réponses [Dernière contribution]
Megver83
Hors ligne
A rejoint: 12/21/2015

I mean, which kernel has more hardware free compatibility?

onpon4
Hors ligne
A rejoint: 05/30/2012

Linux-libre by a landslide. The GNU Hurd is not suitable for general use.

pizzaiolo
Hors ligne
A rejoint: 03/12/2015

Linux-libre, without a doubt. Hurd mostly works in virtual machines at the moment, not real hardware.

Megver83
Hors ligne
A rejoint: 12/21/2015

mmm... and when there is gonna exists Hurd distros apart from Debian GNU/Hurd

jxself
Hors ligne
A rejoint: 09/13/2010

GuixSD has hurd.

pizzaiolo
Hors ligne
A rejoint: 03/12/2015

Also, there's Arch Hurd.

jxself
Hors ligne
A rejoint: 09/13/2010

Yes, but I don't mention it because it's Arch and Arch isn't on the FSF's list of endorsed distros. GuixSD is the only FSF-endorsed distro with Hurd.

pizzaiolo
Hors ligne
A rejoint: 03/12/2015

AFAIK Debian Hurd and Arch Hurd are separate projects from Debian and Arch (GNU/) Linux, so they haven't been reviewed by the FSF at all.

lembas
Hors ligne
A rejoint: 05/13/2010

"The DDE environment allows for reusing half of the Linux 2.6.32 network device drivers, and experimental support for SATA devices was added in May 2013. On the other side, support for character devices (like sound cards) and other hardware (USB, multicore) is mostly missing."

-- https://gnu.org/software/hurd/hurd/status.html

vita_cell
Hors ligne
A rejoint: 07/19/2015

Only Debian comes out of the box with Hurd?