LinuxVoice interview: Mir vs. Wayland

1 réponse [Dernière contribution]
__martin__
Hors ligne
A rejoint: 12/25/2012
Jodiendo
Hors ligne
A rejoint: 01/09/2013

the following article/ comment from mr.evanx in October 18, 2014, summarizes everything.

However, i also guess there were political considerations, in particular Canonical feel they got burnt by Gnome. That relationship was unsatisfactory in terms of realising their mobile ambitions and convergence goals.

NIH was undoubtedly a factor, along with other factors – technical, political and commercial.

Also I understand that Gnome, KDE, and other relevant projects, would prefer to cater for Wayland as the only new emerging display server, and not another display server as well (Mir).

Ultimately it’s Canonical own money, and so they can do what they want. But in fairness to them, they have lofty ambitions of convergence, and commercial imperative to deliver their vision.
=============================================================================
1- there were political considerations, in particular Canonical feel they got burnt by Gnome

2- That relationship was unsatisfactory in terms of realising their mobile ambitions and convergence goals.

3- NIH was undoubtedly a factor, along with other factors – technical, political and commercial.

4- Ultimately it’s Canonical own money, and so they can do what they want.

Good luck in that, canonical! be ready to compete and lose money with the competition, your money is just pennies to the competition.