Some GFDL packages have a misleading name

Projet:Trisquel
Version:6.0
Composant:Packages
Catégorie:Tâche
Priorité:normal
Attribué:Non assigné
Statut:active
Description

Packages licensed as GNU FDL with invariant sections are no DFSG-free, but we do not follow the Debian guidelines for that particular point, but the FSF ones. The package names, inherited from Debian and Ubuntu, are missleading an should be changed. The related packages are:

* tetex-doc-nonfree
* texinfo-doc-nonfree

Sam, 03/17/2012 - 23:36
Version:»

This issue is still present in version 5.5.

Sam, 03/17/2012 - 23:39
mar, 04/30/2013 - 22:21
Version:» 6.0
mer, 05/01/2013 - 21:58
Composant:Programs» Packages
$ aptitude search nonfree
p   texinfo-doc-nonfree             - texinfo and info documentation that is non-free
v   tuxtype-data-nonfree            -