Some GFDL packages have a misleading name

Projekt:Trisquel
Version:6.0
Komponente:Packages
Kategorie:Aufgabe
Priorität:normal
Zugewiesen:nicht zugewiesen
Status:active
Beschreibung

Packages licensed as GNU FDL with invariant sections are no DFSG-free, but we do not follow the Debian guidelines for that particular point, but the FSF ones. The package names, inherited from Debian and Ubuntu, are missleading an should be changed. The related packages are:

* tetex-doc-nonfree
* texinfo-doc-nonfree

Sa, 03/17/2012 - 22:36
Version:»

This issue is still present in version 5.5.

Sa, 03/17/2012 - 22:39
Di, 04/30/2013 - 21:21
Version:» 6.0
Mi, 05/01/2013 - 20:58
Komponente:Programs» Packages
$ aptitude search nonfree
p   texinfo-doc-nonfree             - texinfo and info documentation that is non-free
v   tuxtype-data-nonfree            -