Soumis par
lembas le dim, 01/29/2012 - 19:44
[GFSD Issue] Package 'earcandy' mentions proprietary software
You must login before you can vote.
Projet: | Trisquel |
Version: | 6.0 |
Composant: | Programs |
Catégorie: | Rapporter un bogue |
Priorité: | blocking |
Attribué: | Non assigné |
Statut: | wrong |
Do apt-cache show earcandy and a proprietary software is mentioned in use cases.
I'll take this one. marking as critical.
Also packages sipwitch and skytools mention the same proprietary software.
Ok so I have written package helpers for skytools and earcandy. I am leaving sipwitch alone because if you read the description it states:
"SIP Witch can be used on the desktop to create bottom-up secure calling networks as a free software alternative to Skype."
Simply mentioning non-free software isn't a problem. If you read the GFSD it states that we can't steer users towards non-free software (i.e. recommend it to them). Simply saying in a program description that program x is a free replacement for proprietary program y isn't steering people towards using y. However, the other two packages mentioned skype in a fashion that would condone the user using the non-free program so I have removed those references.
Here is a link to the patch on the dev mailing list.
Re-assigning to upstream:
Earcandy:
Skytools:
The earcandy 0.9+bzr12-2 apt-cache output for 6.0 is:
...
Description: Sound level manager for PulseAudio
Homepage: https://launchpad.net/earcandy
Description-md5: 848320defa4c41ab7c365720edd41eb7
Bugs: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+filebug
Origin: Ubuntu
So i believe this bug can be marked as fixed, or we want to fix that for 5.5 still?
5.5 end-of-lifes in two months, probably not worth the hassle.
ps. I have zero authority on the subject.
Oh, i just clicked the homepage link of the apt-cache output, and see on their launchpad page is still such as info "Fade out music/video players on skype call" :/
Quidam has repeatedly declined patches such as this one from all senders. The only interpretation of this is *mentioning* proprietary or non-free software does not necessarily count as GNU FSDG (formerly) 'recommending' it or (currently) 'steer people towards.'
Therefore I'm closing this as wrong.