Does Richard Stallman have a protégé?

10 Antworten [Letzter Beitrag]
sradms0
Offline
Beigetreten: 08/24/2015

Long live RMS, of course, but I am curious about this.
Anyone know?

loldier
Offline
Beigetreten: 02/17/2016

Like a brother in aRMS?

SuperTramp83

I am a translator!

Offline
Beigetreten: 10/31/2014

>a brother in aRMS

4832183242_063689028a_z.jpg
pragmatist

I am a member!

Offline
Beigetreten: 03/03/2016

"Like a brother in aRMS?"

*Groan* :-)

pragmatist

I am a member!

Offline
Beigetreten: 03/03/2016

I agree

loldier
Offline
Beigetreten: 02/17/2016

If the OP is asking whether RMS is mentoring an apprentice and future successor, I don't think so. He's one of a kind. He'll work until the end and pass the torch only reluctantly in the face of it. I don't confuse this with the presidency of FSF. His ideas will live on but without him I'm sure there will be some changes. Can Torvalds be replaced?

pizzaiolo
Offline
Beigetreten: 03/12/2015

Linus is just a technician. Find an apt kernel dev and put him/her in place. RMS, on the other hand, is one of a kind, like you said. It's going to create a tremendous hole when he passes away.

Magic Banana

I am a member!

I am a translator!

Offline
Beigetreten: 07/24/2010

rms always encourages *anyone* to advocate for free software. He will certainly do so until he cannot. There is no need for a protégé. Neither would it be good.

pragmatist

I am a member!

Offline
Beigetreten: 03/03/2016

"The reports of my death have been greatly exaggerated"
-Mark Twain

Alij
Offline
Beigetreten: 05/08/2012

... that guy.

loldier
Offline
Beigetreten: 02/17/2016

Cory Doctorow might be somebody to consider. I don't know. Even a hint at RSM not being here forever feels out of place but it's a question that comes in due course.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cory_Doctorow

The most likely outcome is that nobody's going to fill Stallman's boots. It can't be done and every revolution makes the mistake of apotheosis for the founding father. He will be adored and referred to as the progenitor of the movement and the disciples will be quarrelsome over his legacy. The freedom tenets are there to stay, I'm sure, carved in stone like the amendments of the US Constitution.

As for division or secessionism in the movement, it was already done in 1998. I draw parallels with the 1054 split of the church.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/East-West_Schism