suggestions to uruk gnu/linux 2.0
- Anmelden oder Registrieren um Kommentare zu schreiben
hi
we will start to develop uruk gnu/linux 2.0
What do you want to contain in it
How do you want it to be
All suggestions Ar welcome
and we will try to implement all suggestions
have fun and be free
ali miracle
I am a member!
Maybe an accessible login greeter, such as the one used in Trisquel? How about an accessible net installer, such as in Debian? I'd suggest sticking to Mate 1.12, based on problem reports that latelyh come up on Sonar GNU support forum. if you are sticking with Mate, how about including audacious as the music player, and vlc as the audio/video player? I'd suggest removing or restricting the Ubuntu Mate software boutique to free repositories. Finally, has the trouble with accessibility of graphical applications, run as superuser, been addressed in distros running Mate?
> Maybe an accessible login greeter, such as the one used in Trisquel?
ok
> How about an accessible net installer, such as in Debian?
we will try
> I'd suggest sticking to Mate
> 1.12, based on problem reports that latelyh come up on Sonar GNU support forum.
its not best to use Mate
We will become like(as copy) from trisquel
its xfce ok for you?
and What about GNOME Shell?
> if you are sticking with Mate, how about including audacious as the music
> player, and vlc as the audio/video player?
ok
I am a member!
I haven't tried xfce lately, but last time I did, the panel and file manager weren't accessible, though all the apps I tried seemed to be so. Xfce's nice and fast, however, and may be the best option, for the default de, if you're planning to accommodate light-weight systems.
yes we Thinking about using it as default
but The big problem is not accessible (I try it today)
for me I prefer GNOME Shell
its so accessible
What is the best for you
Mate or GNOME Shell?
Hi Alimiracle ;-)
I prefer XFCE
From a general perspective GNOME Shell's large software offer and it's ease of use is a good choice.
a Netinstall Iso with the possibility to install all Desktops Environments would be great,doesn't mean that they all need to be ''customized as you have done with Uruk 1.0 MATE"
;-)
Thank you
XFCE will be the default
but we Thinking to make Custom iso for users nede accessible (for me I cant use XFCE)
but I confused what to use
I am a translator!
> What do you want to contain in it
How do you want it to be
Based on the next Debian stable with the Pantheon DE by default. Can you do that for me? :D
I am a member!
For the live image, go with GNOME Shell; it works and is accessible; I just don't like all that overhead. If you can get speech and braille into the net install, as Debian has done, and offer all the desktops, with whatever accessibility they support, I think everyone's covered.
I am a member!
As I write this, I am using Uruk 32-bit edition on my laptop, having a Core 2 Duo processor and 3 gb ram; The running Mate desktop is very fast, and applications seem to load more quickly than they would, even in the stock Triisquel 7. I had trouble getting orca to run on my two older machines; on the large Dell machine, speech died once I started the installer. On the Asus netbook, I never got orca to come up. I'm still running Uruk 1 from a usb drive, btw.
Here is a distribution that has an "easy access"xfce desktop with a Main menu.
https://handylinux.org/index-en.html
I do agree Mate is lightweight and maybe more accessible than XFCE
What about LXQT ?
http://lxqt.org/images/screenshots/ambiance.png
- Anmelden oder Registrieren um Kommentare zu schreiben