Revision of Trisquel 9.0 development plans from Wed, 04/18/2018 - 17:40

The revisions let you track differences between multiple versions of a post.

Just as we release Trisquel 8.0, the development of the next version begins! Following the naming suggestions thread I've picked Etiona, which sounds good and has the fewest search results.

We currently do our development in a rented dedicated server in France, and although it is functional it has many performance and setup issues. It has 32 gigs of RAM, which may sound like plenty but it is below the sweet spot where you can create big enough ramdisks to compile large packages without having to ever write to disk during the build process, which greatly improves performance. It also has only 8 cores and rather slow disks. The good news is that the FSF has generously decided to host a much larger dedicated build server for us, which will allow us to scale up operations. The new machine will have fast replicated disk, lots of RAM and 2x 12 core CPUs.

Along with renewing the hardware, we need to revamp the software build infrastructure. Currently the development server runs a GitLab instance, Jenkins and pbuilder based build jails. This combination was a big improvement from the custom made scripts of early releases, but it has some downsides that have been removed by sbuild. Sbuild is lighter and faster, and has better crash recovery and reporting. I will investigate wether we still need Jenkins or if we can replace it with GitLab's CI modules, which should make for better integration. On top of that, sbuild makes it easier to do cross-compilation for ARM and other architectures. This bigger server will also have more capacity to host services like packages.trisquel.info, which is currently in need of a revamp.

Work on the build infrastructure should be done with the target of facilitating volunteer contributions. As it stands now, merge requests require my review and approval, which has proven to be a bottleneck. A system that allows volunteer to approve each other would speed up development and grow our community. The planned improvements to the CI setup would allow for contributors to run build tests on the development server easier.

Thu, 05/03/2018 - 19:50

Wow! I'm very excited to have my suggestion picked as the name for Trisquel 9. Now I really feel like part of the community :) It's also exciting to hear about all these improvements happening in the dev infrastructure, especially the decentralization that will allow progress to involve more volunteers, and happen must faster, without stressing you out so much.

These are indeed exciting times for computing in freedom. I'm looking forward to getting comfy in my new Flidas slippers, but I'll probably keep Belenos running as a dual-boot until 14.04 reaches end-of-life. When might we expect to see Etiona released?

Fri, 05/04/2018 - 15:03

I want to see Trisquel 9 have a better pipeline for contributions to it. I am currently reading LFS (Linux From Scratch) in the hope that I may be able to contribute to Trisquel going forward.