Restricted boot - a Memeber of the European Parliament replies
- Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires
As a consequence
of the
uncovering of the boot restrictions the Microsoft Windows 8 Hardware
Certification Requirements place on ARM PCs I wrote to my MEP,
Linda McAvan. I'll summarise her reply:
- A question was asked late last year in the European Parliament
concerning Microsoft Windows 8. The core of the Commission's reply
was"Whether or not there is a violation of European competition rules
and in particular of Article 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of
the European Union, however, depends on a range of factual, legal
and economic considerations which are difficult to assess before the
product has been finalised and before any computers running the
Windows 8 [sic] operating systems have been placed on the market."The reply goes on to reassure whoever the MEP was that the Commission
would keep their eye on the matter. - Ms McAvan feels that the finialisation of the Microsoft Windows 8
Hardware Certification Requirements with the restrictions on ARM
PCs is material of substance and is therefore writing a
follow-up question to the Commission. She will write again when
she receives a reply. - She then goes on to remind me of the times the Commission has
given Microsoft a spanking.
Good news I hope you'll agree. The arguments I used are given on my website http://andrewlindley.co.uk/
Well done Sir! Despite the weaseling reply by the Commission so far I look forward to any completely deserved future spankings. If this isn't anti-competitive, I don't know what is.
People unaware of the whole "secure boot" situation might want to read http://www.fsf.org/campaigns/secure-boot-vs-restricted-boot as well.
- Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires