Sent an Email to GNU.org about these 2 new Libre OS
- Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires
What do you think about these OS?
Why haven't they still been approved?
| Pièce jointe | Taille |
|---|---|
| New GNU OS.png | 21.77 Ko |
> What do you think about these OS?
Nothing.
> Why haven't they still been approved?
Have they officially asked to be included in the list? If yes, then they just must be patient. Of course if the process is taking years then maybe a poke is in order.
LibertyBSD has applied if you read the
https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/gnu-linux-libre/2015-02/threads.html#00018
As for Uruk 1.0 it's not applied (unless i'm mistaken)
https://uruk.tuxfamily.org/dist/en.html#about
Librepup as well(?)but this project is often even unreachable by internet
Formely submissions which were abandonned
gdNewHat Hatrack
ConnochaetOS (Active-abandoned submission-not endorsed)
https://connochaetos.org/wiki/home
Fork of ConnochaetOS
http://delicate-linux.net/
It's worth noting that LibertyBSD is not a GNU distribution, so it wouldn't be listed on gnu.org/distros/free-distros.html, but rather on gnu.org/distros/free-non-gnu-distros.html.
Yep, and that's not until their problems are fixed: Last time it was evaluated the installer doesn't actually install LibertyBSD. It installs OpenBSD instead!
http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/gnu-linux-libre/2016-02/msg00001.html has a link to a screenshot.
They replied saying they'd fix it:
http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/gnu-linux-libre/2016-02/msg00003.html
But that was February and we're now in June. I'm not sure how that fits in with the FSF's criteria of having a "commitment to correct mistakes"...
- Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires