Stallman uses Trisquel GNU/Linux for computation.

31 réponses [Dernière contribution]
lap4fsf
Hors ligne
A rejoint: 10/12/2014

Howdy, fellow trisquel hackers?

I am an avid follower of Richard M Stallman and Free Software Foundation, in perticular.

These days, RMS is using a Thinkpad X60 computer with a free initialization program (libreboot) and 'Free as in Freespeech' Trisquel GNU/Linux to carryout his daily chores.

https://www.stallman.org/stallman-computing.html

I submit this story as a tribute to Trisquel GNU/Linux community.

suitsmeveryfine
Hors ligne
A rejoint: 08/15/2014

Thank you! It was nice to read that page again. It now contains a lot of new stuff.

t3g
t3g
Hors ligne
A rejoint: 05/15/2011

Its too bad he doesn't specify if he was using 6 or 7 of Trisquel.

Infieles
Hors ligne
A rejoint: 12/19/2014

I think it's still Trisquel 6 because he's still using LibreOffice 3 on this picture last Dec 27, 2014 at 313c. However, feel free to correct me on this one.

Screenshot from 2015-01-02 12:59:06.png
Infieles
Hors ligne
A rejoint: 12/19/2014
Jabjabs
Hors ligne
A rejoint: 07/05/2014

It is awesome that he is also using this brilliant OS. It is also however a shame that it does show that the state of GNewSense is in a less than desirable place. Even if I don't use it, I don't want to see any of these 100% purely free distros fade away.

shokin
Hors ligne
A rejoint: 03/01/2013

I don't use yet gNewSense, but want to try it later. Is it in a bad situation ?

Sansonetto
Hors ligne
A rejoint: 05/23/2014
shokin
Hors ligne
A rejoint: 03/01/2013

Ah ! but they will solve it.

a_slacker_here
Hors ligne
A rejoint: 06/29/2013

I'm not surprised to see that he switched to Trisquel, It was just a matter of time.

wpurcell
Hors ligne
A rejoint: 11/07/2009

Glad to see gNewSense is making headway. I loved 2.3 and had the devil of a time switching to Trisquel.
In retrospect though, I'm certainly glad I did!

HuangLao
Hors ligne
A rejoint: 01/19/2014

gNewsense is alive and well.

Currently in beta phase for gNewsense 4.0 Ucclia, tracking Debian Wheezy. Work will begin soon on the next version based on Debian Jessie.

There should be more love for gNewsense and Trisquel, especially between the two communities. They are more like siblings then the other distros. Trisquel is great for those that want bleeding edge latest programs and Ubuntu additions,gNewsense for those who value stability and a more conservative approach, or for those that do not like Ubuntu or its derivatives.

tomlukeywood
Hors ligne
A rejoint: 12/05/2014

i like gnewsense as it is very stable
but i wish it supported the amount of hardware trisuquel dose
do you know if more hardware will be supported in this release

as its now based of wheezy my wifi card should work?(my wifi card works in debian 7 wheezy with free software)

HuangLao
Hors ligne
A rejoint: 01/19/2014

Yes, it should support more hardware since it is more current now. If your WiFi works under Wheezy it should work under gNewsense 4.0, if not you can always use ThinkPenguin for a USB WiFi.

https://www.thinkpenguin.com/gnu-linux/penguin-wireless-g-usb-adapter

tomlukeywood
Hors ligne
A rejoint: 12/05/2014

just to let you know it failed to detect my network hardware (ethernet and wifi)
and it worked with only free software on debian 7 wheezy

Dave_Hunt

I am a member!

Hors ligne
A rejoint: 09/19/2011

I'd hardly call Trisquel "bleeding edge"; it's based on Ubuntu LTS releases.

Jabjabs
Hors ligne
A rejoint: 07/05/2014

Bleeding edge... relative to the Libre distros. :D

tct
tct

I am a member!

Hors ligne
A rejoint: 10/23/2011

On 03.01.2015 22:50, name at domain wrote:
> Bleeding edge... relative to the Libre distros. :D

Isn't it that Parabola?

--
Tiberiu C. Turbureanu
Președinte, Fundația Ceata
http://turbureanu.ro/contact

Susții libertatea artelor și tehnologiilor?
Înscrie-te ca membru: http://ceata.org/%C3%AEnscrieri

HuangLao
Hors ligne
A rejoint: 01/19/2014

LOL, so true. This is clearly what I meant. Compared to Debian stable and the Libre distros, Trisquel is bleeding/cutting edge, while still maintaining some stability.

I would say it is the best Libre Distro (or at least near the top) for those that want the most current programs for the widest range of hardware, and also those brand new to GNU/Linux.

For those with more Linux experience or wanting something more stable, or have much older or some arcane hardware then I think it tilts towards gNewsense, especially since it is active again.

Options is one of the things that makes GNU/Linux amazing!

And yes, both support Forums are great as well! :)

onpon4
Hors ligne
A rejoint: 05/30/2012

Just because gNewSense is old and BLAG is outdated doesn't mean that Trisquel is "cutting edge", much less "bleeding edge". Please remember that just a few months ago, the latest version of Trisquel was Trisquel 6, which has software about as old as Debian 7 does. It won't be long before this is the status again; Debian 8 will probably become stable sometime this year.

As has already been said, the bleeding-edge libre distro is easily Parabola. Trisquel and gNewSense are both stable distros; it's just that gNewSense is currently lagging behind Debian by quite a bit, whereas Trisquel pretty closely follows the Ubuntu LTS releases. I wouldn't be surprised if gNewSense catches up in the future.

HuangLao
Hors ligne
A rejoint: 01/19/2014

Not totally accurate but point taken.

Trisquel being based on Ubuntu does pull from Ubuntu LTS which is mainly Debian Testing, not Stable. Therefore, Trisquel's packages are more recent. This is one reason why many people recommend Trisquel or Ubuntu for those who want more recent programs. gNewsense is Debian Stable, so it will always lag behind by design, exactly like Debian Stable, however, is more stable by design as is Debian Stable. Ubuntu LTS still pulls from Testing regardless of the length of support. As opposed to reg. Ubuntu which is mainly Debian Unstable. All comes down to what a person wants or needs. Debian Stable or gNewsense=slightly older but rock solid will not break, Ubuntu which is Debian Unstable and prone to frequent breaks during upgrades or somewhere in between which is Ubuntu LTS or Debian Testing or Trisquel, not as risky as Unstable but not as rock solid as Stable, you do, however, get more up to date programs.

There is a good discussion on the askubuntu thread, dealing with servers but still applicable to the general differences: http://askubuntu.com/questions/15314/debian-stable-vs-ubuntu-lts-for-server

Nice website by the way onpon!

Legimet
Hors ligne
A rejoint: 12/10/2013

Ubuntu LTS is taken from a snapshot of testing. For Trisquel 6/Ubuntu 12.04, this snapshot was taken at a time (probably in late 2011) when squeeze was stable and wheezy was in testing, so it has about the same package versions as Debian 7.0 wheezy. And since the snapshot of testing is taken before the feature freeze, the packages in Ubuntu 12.04 are actually a bit older than those in Debian 7.0. Similarly, the packages in Trisquel 7.0 are a bit older than those in Debian 8.0 jessie (for example GCC 4.8 vs 4.9).

onetechbuddy
Hors ligne
A rejoint: 05/26/2014

Blag won't be outdated anymore. Alpha images of 20K are great. Worked like a charm for me. It comes with Gnome 3.10 and some minimal set of applications but the repository is satisfying. Most of the gnome appliations and batteries are there.

onpon4
Hors ligne
A rejoint: 05/30/2012

I should note that while BLAG 200k won't be outdated for another year or so, its software isn't in general newer than Trisquel 7's. But if BLAG catches up with Fedora after this next release it might be able to fulfil the role of "pretty cutting edge, but stable" that Fedora fills among mainstream distros. We'll see.

JadedCtrl
Hors ligne
A rejoint: 08/11/2014

Did anyone even have that much trouble with outdated packages toward the end of Trisquel 6's run? The situation will be about the same rather soon, so I hope not.

onpon4
Hors ligne
A rejoint: 05/30/2012

Trisquel 6 didn't reach the end of its "run". It's not the latest anymore, but it's still supported until 2017.

JadedCtrl
Hors ligne
A rejoint: 08/11/2014

I meant "outdated", such as when Ubuntu 14.04 replaced 12.04, and software began to not have binaries for 12.04, and therefore Trisquel 6.

t3g
t3g
Hors ligne
A rejoint: 05/15/2011

Trisquel 6 is old at this point, but Trisquel 7 is based off of Ubuntu 14.04 which is still pretty recent. Sure, it may be from April, but nothing is stopping you from adding some PPAs.

davidnotcoulthard (non vérifié)
davidnotcoulthard

So the version of Gnewsense based on Wheezy started when Jessie is frozen?

I'm a bit confused as to why they didn't decide to skip Wheezy and track Jessie while liberating it and maybe release Gnewsense 4 not too long after Jessie is released?

Or perhaps I'm just plain ungrateful?

Michał Masłowski

I am a member!

I am a translator!

Hors ligne
A rejoint: 05/15/2010

Ucclia development started before Jessie was frozen. Several
contributors checked which packages from Parkes need
changes/blacklisting in the Wheezy-based release in March 2014 (more
than half a year before Jessie was frozen), I don't know if there are
any earlier public dates for the work being done.

davidnotcoulthard (non vérifié)
davidnotcoulthard

OK. I've definitely missed that.

It was still announced after Jessie was frozen, though.

HuangLao
Hors ligne
A rejoint: 01/19/2014

gNewsense team decided to proceed with Ucclia so it would be a natural transition from 3.0 Parkes, easier migration for the folks using Parkes.

Alot of work was already done on Ucclia and they did not want to just scrap it.

As soon as 4.0 is official (no longer beta), then work will begin on 5.0 tracking Jessie.

Stay tuned!