Trisquel 10.0 RC feedback (3.0)
- Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires
Hello and a great 2022 for you all,
I'll like to thank again for all the previous feedback in the previous 2 posts.
In the last weeks we have been reviewing and fixing the reported issues so this is a Release Candidate, so new and updated feedback is welcome.
The new nabia isos set are dated 26-Jan-2022,
In case you still experience details with downloading iso images, again, you could make use of lftp,
sudo apt install lftp
lftp -c 'set net:idle 10
set net:max-retries 0
set net:reconnect-interval-base 3
set net:reconnect-interval-max 3
pget -n 10 -c "http://cdbuilds.trisquel.org/triskel_10.0_amd64.iso"'
Where triskel can be any version you want to try.
Thanks in advance for your attention and we have to release nabia very soon.
Cheers!
[1] https://trisquel.info/es/forum/trisquel-100-feedback
[2] https://trisquel.info/es/forum/trisquel-100-feedback-20
Thanks a lot we're waiting for it's release soon!
I am a member!
Thank you for all the amazing work you guys are doing.
Is there any more danish translations needed? Like in the grub menu ect?
I am a translator!
I decided to try installing it on my desktop.
At first, I have
graphics initialization failed
error setting up gfxboot
boot:
I typed "help" and enter, then I saw some text that I could not fully read as Trisquel 10 started. A little strange but ok.
My desktop main disk has (no encryption used):
- an ext2 partition holding /boot of Trisquel 9
- an extended partition holding a logical volume group in which there is
- a volume for swap
- a volume for root of Trisquel 9
- a volume for root of Debian 11
- spare space
I created a 30 GB volume for root and a 150 GB volume for home.
I launched the installer, selected the volumes and, when asking to proceed with installation, had a message:
No EFI System Partition was found. The system will likely not be able to boot successfully and the installation may fail.
Please go back and install an EFI system partition.
Currently, I have Debian and Trisquel 9 in the boot menu. This was done automatically after I installed Trisquel 9 and then Debian. fdisk -l says:
$ sudo fdisk -l /dev/sda
Disk /dev/sda: 931.51 GiB, 1000204886016 bytes, 1953525168 sectors
Disk model: CT1000MX500SSD1
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 4096 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 4096 bytes / 4096 bytes
Disklabel type: dos
Disk identifier: 0xd025b94d
Device Boot Start End Sectors Size Id Type
/dev/sda1 * 2048 1499135 1497088 731M 83 Linux
/dev/sda2 1501182 1953523711 1952022530 930.8G 5 Extended
/dev/sda5 1501184 1953523711 1952022528 930.8G 8e Linux LVM
Partition 2 does not start on physical sector boundary.
Do I really need this EFI system partition?
If so, I am not sure what its size should be and how to create it without disturbing Trisquel 9, which uses /dev/sda2 as /boot. I also hope I can still boot Trisquel 9 and Debian after I installed Trisquel 10.
Do I really need this EFI system partition? If so, I am not sure what its size should be...
I received that same message months ago, when I tried to install Debian 11 on my current laptop. Looking at my partitions now, I apparently created a 536 MB (weird choice!) EFI partition... and 531 MB of them are free. That is why I guess you could create a smaller partition than I did (not that I really miss the free 531 MB: they are on a 120 GB SSD I only use for the system and the swap; /home is on a separate disk).
... and how to create it without disturbing Trisquel 9, which uses /dev/sda2 as /boot.
I would either try to do that from the installer ("Something else" type of installation or whatever it is called nowadays) or use GParted. I do not remember what I did, but certainly one or the other. Terminal programs (parted or fdisk or...) can certainly be used too.
I am a translator!
Thanks for the advice.
Mistake: /boot of Trisquel 9 is /dev/sda1, not /dev/sda2.
When I installed Debian 11 on this desktop, I was not asked for that. I think I used what is called "text mode installer" (some kind of curses display).
On partitioning, I was thinking to make a choice between:
- split the space of current /dev/sda1 in two, one piece for the EFI system partition another for /boot of Trisquel 9
- move /boot of Trisquel 9 to the root logical volume of Trisquel 9, or a new logical volume, and use the space it was using for the EFI system partition
- trash Trisquel 9, i.e. use the space of /dev/sda1 for EFI system partition
I was thinking about 2. or 3. in order to avoid renumbering of devices but then I looked at Trisquel 10 mini that I installed on an old laptop, it has
Device Start End Sectors Size Type
/dev/sda1 2048 4095 2048 1M BIOS boot
/dev/sda2 4096 1054719 1050624 513M EFI System
/dev/sda3 1054720 30351359 29296640 14G Linux filesystem
/dev/sda4 30351360 488396799 458045440 218.4G Linux filesystem
So perhaps this installer will even want to have a "BIOS boot" partition.
My current Debian system is my main computing system now, there are too many unknown things now, I won't try installing Trisquel 10 before I have a better understanding on how to do in order to avoid problems with my current system.
I am a translator!
I upgraded Trisquel 9 on my desktop successfully.
Nice thing: with Gajim 1.3.3 from Guix, the OMEMO shield icons are displayed correctly, unlike with Trisquel 9.
Very unpleasant thing: this morning, very quickly, the Mate session froze, same thing like I had with Trisquel 9.
So I'll go on using Debian on my desktop, and Trisquel on my laptops.
I am a member!
Hello. I can see a build from yesterday with a FSF (trisquel_10.0-fsf_amd64.iso) variant. What does this mean?
It is probably related to this:
I am a member!
Oh, is that what it is? Like Markmus, I had also wondered about the FSF thing, so I took the .manifest files of the "FSF" ISO and of the vanilla ISO and diffed them against each other, and if I remember correctly the "FSF" one lacked some packages for LibreOffice help (in many languages) that the vanilla version included. So I assumed it might have something to do with those files or their licenses, but now that I think about it, it would be out of character for the Trisquel project to handle any such problem by offering two flavours.
A small note about the battery monitor on Trisquel Mini: as mentioned in the previous feedback thread [1], the battery monitor must be added to the menu bar. Once that is done, the alarm needs the libnotify package to work:
sudo apt install libnotify-bin
[1] https://trisquel.info/en/forum/trisquel-100-feedback-20#comment-163544
- Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires