fre version from lazarus

What is the problem with the license? The Lazarus compiler is under the terms of the GNU GPL and the Lazarus Component Library is under the GNU LGPL. Lazarus actually is in Trisquel's repository. For instance, you can install it from "Add/Remove Applications".

If you are talking about the license of the programs compiled with Lazarus, the GNU GPL and LGPL do not impose anything on them. I just hope you will choose a free software license if you distribute them.

fromWikipedia, the free encyclopedia
"""

Lazarus is
free software
. Different portions are distributed under different
free software licenses
, including
GPL,
LGPL,
MPL
, and a modified version of LGPL.
[3]

Specifically, the LCL, which is statically built into the produced executables, is licensed under a modified version of the LGPL, granting extra permissions
to allow it to be statically built into the produced software, including
proprietary
ones.

Note that installing a
design-time
package is equivalent to linking to the IDE. Thus, distributing the Lazarus IDE with a GPL-incompatible design-time package (e.g. the
JEDI
packages, which are licensed under the
Mozilla Public License
) pre-installed would cause a license violation. This does not prohibit proprietary packages from being developed with Lazarus, though.
"""

What part of that makes it nonfree?

I Think lcl

I think it's free software with a "permissive touch".
The fact that a piece of software is permissive might be a problem but it can't be solved by the users.
Even if they make a new program out of it and license it under the gpl, the old version is still out there and can be used by developers to make a proprietary program.
But we can use this program without any hesitation since it's free as in freedom.

I Think we must make fre Branch from lazarus

There are ways to install lazarus
but Has problems in the license( license violation)