Super Tux Kart -> Super Freedo Kart?
Progetto: | Trisquel |
Versione: | 9.0 |
Componente: | License problems |
Categoria: | segnalazione di bug |
Priorità: | normal |
Assigned: | Non assegnata |
Stato: | closed |
Jump to:
Currently I think there's a freedom flaw in Super Tux Kart:
The BSD Daemon is copyrighted. Permission was granted to Super Tux Kart project to reuse, but from what I understand, if I then wanted to fork Super Tux Kart I would be unable to use the BSD Daemon.
https://github.com/supertuxkart/stk-code/issues/3062
I therefore think the BSD Daemon should be removed from Super Tux Kart.
Though as you can see from the title I wonder if we should go further. Tux is the mascot of Linus' Kernel, which contains non-free components. Perhaps we should recolor him blue and name him Freedo, after the Linux-Libre Kernel (Freedo is not as pudgy as Tux, but as a quick fix it should be enough). Similarly Puffy is the mascot of the openBSD project, which contains non-free software (worse, the openBSD project has been extremely hostile to the FSF, using Puffy in a comic to fight against the idea of copyleft and the FSDG[1]), perhaps he should be removed as well less it appear we are endorsing these cute characters, and their respective freedom-flawed software. As well as you can see from the above bug report there's an open question if Puffy is even able to be used.
I haven't played STK very much, but I would wager there would probably be an issue with outright deleting these characters (they probably show up somewhere in story mode? I haven't played the story mode). Here's possible replacements for the BSD Daemon and Puffy:
Replicant (mascot of Replicant):
https://online.supertuxkart.net/addons.php?type=karts&name=replicant
Katie (mascot of KDE women's community):
https://online.supertuxkart.net/addons.php?type=karts&name=katie
- Login o registrati per inviare commenti
I don't think this is an actual issue. The Beastie kart in STK is not derived from the nonfree Beastie mascot. Also, GFSD doesn't require nonfunctional data to be under a free license anyway.
I agree with Legimet take on the matter.
Whether there might be changes that we would like to see happen this is more of a cosmetic issue that AFAICT there is no freedom issue involved.
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.en.html