FSF Vision Survey | The Free Software Foundation needs your feedback. Their vision survey is up until the end of January.

26 replies [Last post]
pizzaiolo
Offline
Joined: 03/12/2015

Help them help free software!

https://www.fsf.org/survey

Mzee
Offline
Joined: 07/10/2013

Thank you. I just completed the survey.

ADFENO
Offline
Joined: 12/31/2012

I also just completed the survey. :D

moxalt
Offline
Joined: 06/19/2015

So did I! I posted quite the wall of text ;)

ADFENO
Offline
Joined: 12/31/2012

I also just completed the survey. :D

pizzaiolo
Offline
Joined: 03/12/2015

Great! Please tell more people about it :)

ADFENO
Offline
Joined: 12/31/2012

Basically, I wrote about the need to get representatives per country and also per state of a country, and the need to make the inactive ones more active. There is also need for a global community communication and interaction (but the main challenge is actually the language used, for which the Esperanto language can perhaps solve this issue, since it's easier to learn, and some countries like Brazil have a non-mandatory provision for high school to teach it if the school receives enough demand for it, which I think could be mandatory instead of based on demand).

Also there is the "fork and forget" kind of attitude. It's acceptable to have this kind of attitude when something isn't really in the goals of the original project, but for translations, localized forums and mods, things can stay in the same place. Example: The MinetestBrasil.com community was divided from the Minetest.net community just because a Brazilian Portuguese forum wasn't made there, or because of the language boundaries.

Finally I also wrote about misrepresentations in other countries.

Jabjabs
Offline
Joined: 07/05/2014

This is actually a really good point. The vacuum they leave in other counties has allowed others to take up the torch and to fill the gap but that is not an excellent solution.

Jabjabs
Offline
Joined: 07/05/2014

This is actually a really good point. The vacuum they leave in other counties
has allowed others to take up the torch and to fill the gap but that is not
an excellent solution.

ADFENO
Offline
Joined: 12/31/2012

Basically, I wrote about the need to get representatives per country and also
per state of a country, and the need to make the inactive ones more active.
There is also need for a global community communication and interaction (but
the main challenge is actually the language used, for which the Esperanto
language can perhaps solve this issue, since it's easier to learn, and some
countries like Brazil have a non-mandatory provision for high school to teach
it if the school receives enough demand for it, which I think could be
mandatory instead of based on demand).

Also there is the "fork and forget" kind of attitude. It's acceptable to have
this kind of attitude when something isn't really in the goals of the
original project, but for translations, localized forums and mods, things can
stay in the same place. Example: The MinetestBrasil.com community was divided
from the Minetest.net community just because a Brazilian Portuguese forum
wasn't made there, or because of the language boundaries.

Mzee
Offline
Joined: 07/10/2013

In this survey I mentioned that I reckon it's important to stop listing Gnash as a "high priority" project. Flash is a slowly dying technology and the resources spent on developing Gnash can be much better used developing other crucial free software like Replicant, Libreboot, etc...

Calinou
Offline
Joined: 03/08/2014

Resource management in software doesn't work like that. This is not a strategy game; if people are interested to work on a specific but less useful project, they will. They won't be productive if you force them to work on what you believe is important.

Mzee
Offline
Joined: 07/10/2013

I completely agree with you that you can't force people to work on other projects. I just wouldn't list Gnash as a high priority project as this probably means the developers are getting some money from the FSF which could be used much better for other projects.

onpon4
Offline
Joined: 05/30/2012

I'm pretty sure the FSF doesn't send money to programmers working on these projects in most cases.

pizzaiolo
Offline
Joined: 03/12/2015

Help them help free software!

https://www.fsf.org/survey

onpon4
Offline
Joined: 05/30/2012

I'm pretty sure the FSF doesn't send money to programmers working on these
projects in most cases.

Mzee
Offline
Joined: 07/10/2013

I completely agree with you that you can't force people to work on other
projects. I just wouldn't list Gnash as a high priority project as this
probably means the developers are getting some money from the FSF which could
be used much better for other projects.

Calinou
Offline
Joined: 03/08/2014

Resource management in software doesn't work like that. This is not a
strategy game; if people are interested to work on a specific but less useful
project, they will. They won't be productive if you force them to work on
what you believe is important.

Embracer245
Offline
Joined: 08/24/2015

I completed it a couple of days ago. Share this with somebody you know.

MeNoMore
Offline
Joined: 10/05/2015

Completed the survey as well. XD

davidpgil
Offline
Joined: 08/26/2015

Done!

Mzee
Offline
Joined: 07/10/2013

Thank you. I just completed the survey.

pizzaiolo
Offline
Joined: 03/12/2015

Great! Please tell more people about it :)

Mzee
Offline
Joined: 07/10/2013

In this survey I mentioned that I reckon it's important to stop listing Gnash
as a "high priority" project. Flash is a slowly dying technology and the
resources spent on developing Gnash can be much better used developing other
crucial free software like Replicant, Libreboot, etc...

Embracer245
Offline
Joined: 08/24/2015

I completed it a couple of days ago. Share this with somebody you know.

MeNoMore
Offline
Joined: 10/05/2015

Completed the survey as well. XD

davidpgil
Offline
Joined: 08/26/2015

Done!