checking downloads

9 respostas [Última entrada]
Gottfried
Desconectado
Joined: 02/22/2022

Hello,

sorry for the simple question but something went wrong.

In downloading aramo I got those sums but they don't match.

259e769fda834b14ae38a94543deb7072599cb759b8dde2c4a547e710cb7aea5 trisquel_11.0.1_amd64.iso

sha256sum trisquel_11.0.1_amd64.iso.sha256
1a28c21cb5e53c76afd81d51b27a403a950b1c22b7b8e504f3c8db7e1d388f32 trisquel_11.0.1_amd64.iso.sha256

So again,
what is the right procedure?
How do I get the first sum, I can compare with the second sum from the file sha256?

thanks

Gottfried

prospero
Desconectado
Joined: 05/20/2022

This works for me:

sha256sum -c trisquel_11.0.1_amd64.iso.sha256

Without the "-c" option you are in fact computing the sha256 hash of the sha256 file itself.

Gottfried
Desconectado
Joined: 02/22/2022

thanks

I got that:

gfp@Tuxedo ~/Downloads/Trisquel$ sha256sum -c trisquel_11.0.1_amd64.iso.sha256
trisquel_11.0.1_amd64.iso: OK
trisquel_11.0.1_amd64.iso.sha256: FAILURE
sha256sum: WARNING: 1 line was not correctly formatted
sha256sum: WARNING: 1 calculated checksum did NOT match

prospero
Desconectado
Joined: 05/20/2022

The trisquel_11.0.1_amd64.iso.sha256 file should only have one line.

You probably added the other two lines to compare visually, which would explain the two errors you got.

Gottfried
Desconectado
Joined: 02/22/2022

with KDE it worked

gfp@Tuxedo ~/Downloads/Trisquel$ sha256sum -c triskel_11.0.1_amd64.iso.sha256
triskel_11.0.1_amd64.iso: OK

Gottfried

Gottfried
Desconectado
Joined: 02/22/2022

thanks

The trisquel_11.0.1_amd64.iso.sha256 file should only have one line.

You probably added the other two lines to compare visually, which would explain the two errors you got.

I am not sure what you mean.

I tried again but got the same result.

prospero
Desconectado
Joined: 05/20/2022

This means that the checksums match:

trisquel_11.0.1_amd64.iso: OK

If you still have any doubt, you can download the sha256 file again, and check again using the same command:

https://cdimage.trisquel.info/trisquel-images/trisquel_11.0.1_amd64.iso.sha256

Magic Banana

I am a member!

I am a translator!

Desconectado
Joined: 07/24/2010
Gottfried
Desconectado
Joined: 02/22/2022

thanks Magic Banana,

I imported the keys:

gfp@Tuxedo ~/Downloads/Trisquel$ gpg --keyserver keyserver.ubuntu.com --recv-keys D24DDAC9226D5BA5E9F3BED3F5DAAAF74AD4C938
gpg: key F5DAAAF74AD4C938: public key "Trisquel GNU/Linux Archive Automatic Signing Key (11/aramo) <name at domain>" imported
gpg: Total number processed: 1
gpg: imported: 1

gfp@Tuxedo ~/Downloads/Trisquel$ gpg --verify trisquel_11.0.1_amd64.iso.asc
gpg: assuming signed data in 'trisquel_11.0.1_amd64.iso'
gpg: Signature made Fri May 31 04:41:15 2024 CEST
gpg: using RSA key D24DDAC9226D5BA5E9F3BED3F5DAAAF74AD4C938
gpg: Good signature from "Trisquel GNU/Linux Archive Automatic Signing Key (11/aramo) <name at domain>" [unknown]
gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the owner.
Primary key fingerprint: D24D DAC9 226D 5BA5 E9F3 BED3 F5DA AAF7 4AD4 C938

This seems ok,

Gottfried
Desconectado
Joined: 02/22/2022

it is interesting
I downloaded the same file with an other server
but got the same wrong result.

Then I downloaded the sha256sum file again and now everything is fine.

gfp@Tuxedo ~/Downloads$ sha256sum -c trisquel_11.0.1_amd64.iso.sha256
trisquel_11.0.1_amd64.iso: OK

This means that downloading the sha256sum file caused the problem.

thanks to all

Gottfried